Do Details Matter?

It’s been said, “the devil is in the details.”  We’ve all heard the quote. Well, apparently it was originally “God is in the details.”  Rather interesting twist.  Nevertheless, the reason I going down this road relates to knowing the facts before making a judgment. This will flesh itself out later in a post I’m planning on the parables and the use of certain pronouns. However, before that, I thought I would share some information that was rather shocking to me.

In Glen Beck’s book Common Sense he starts section three, “The Political Weapon of Choice,” with this sentence; “The tax code that started in 1913 as fourteen pages now exceeds sixty-seven thousand pages” (p 36). That seemed rather astounding to me so I did a quick bit of research and discovered this: Back in 2006, when twelve different Republican representatives commented on the size of the Title 26 of the United States tax code, there were twelve different answers. When President Bush commented on the same thing, he added a thirteenth answer. The replies ranged from 2,500 to over two million pages in length. One thing most of them had in common however was that the tax code was definitely longer than the Bible. 

Back then, according to the Government Printing Office, the part written by the IRS was over thirteen thousand pages. If you added the part written by Congress, that’s an additional 3,300+ pages. Combined, it amounts to over 16,000 pages. If, in the past three years it has mushroomed to over 67,000 pages, no wonder Secretary Geithner couldn’t get his taxes right!   (Beck does not sight his source for that number.)

Now, I’m not certain how you feel about detail, but 16,000 or 67,000 pages, either one seems to me to be a bit much. Perhaps it’s time to rethink the flat tax idea. Perhaps then we could trim a couple hundred pages off the document!

Switching gears and reflecting on my current study of the Gospel of Mark, I find myself combing through the parables in Ch 4 of Mark. They offer some fascinating details. Not so much the parables themselves, for trying to ascribe detail to elements of a parable is fraught with danger. But rather examining the text that surrounds the parables is what  caught my interest this time. In that context, details can be important and add to the meaning of the overall text.

I suspect that often, in our rush to get to the meat of the matter, we miss some of the nuances of the general text in Scripture. There are times when that is not overly significant other times when it is. For example, who is present, who is Jesus talking to, who is listening if he’s talking to a crowd, etc.. That information can be important. It is similar to the same principle of dealing with the twelve disciples. Yes, Jesus selected twelve specific men to “be with him” but there were many others who were disciples – follower/learners. People who believed in and I suspect followed Jesus virtually everywhere he went.  People who may be nothing more than “extras” on the set. Nonetheless, people that count in the Kingdom of God. We best not dismiss them too easily. They often provide a backdrop for details pertinent to the text and its meaning. That being so, perhaps “God is in the details,” and details do matter.



Filed under Discipleship, Gospel of Mark

2 responses to “Do Details Matter?

  1. I suspect that everything matters to God. We will all know the truth to our personal questions on that day when he comes for His Bride. People sometimes forget that there are three different ways to interpret the Bible: literally, spiritually, and dispensationally.

    I believe that book of Daniel will soon be unsealed and things will come to light that will turn us on our ear. I believe that. Not all revelation is revealed.

    What do you think Norm?

    Have a good one brother. Good writing!


  2. Norm

    I agree, everything matters to God, but that does not necessarily mean God is involved in every matter.

    Regarding three ways to interpret the Bible, I suspect the reality is, people do interpret the Bible in one of those three ways. That does not mean it’s correct, it simply means that people bring to the text preconceived ideas they hope to “see” in the text. I suspect the writers had one way of writing the text, as they saw it based on their particular group of intended readers. My belief is the text should speak for itself and we should adjust our belief system accordingly. In other words, interpret the text contextually and accurately, then wrestle with the rest.

    I’m hesitant to agree with your observation regarding the book of Daniel. But I do wonder about the “not all revelation is revealed” idea. How can it be revelation if it’s not revealed? 🙂

    Thanks for your thoughts.

    PS. you might want to do a search for the post on “Miracle Birth”. I received a comment on that post today with some references that would certainly get your knickers in a bind.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s